Showing posts with label ethereum 2.0 release date. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ethereum 2.0 release date. Show all posts

NO MORE "Ethereum 2.0 Launching Soon" LIES - This Time , it REALLY IS! Here's Why...

Ethereum 2.0 Update News

Ethereum 2.0 continues to strengthen its foundations before the Ethereum mainnet merges with this new version. In the coming days, it could reach the milestone of 400,000 validators who will verify transactions and ensure the proper functioning of the blockchain. 

At the time of publishing this article, there are over 395,465 validators who met the required deposit of ETH in the smart contract of the Beacon Chain, the "beacon chain" is the first fragment of the new 2.0 network. At current rate of growth, we should see 400,000 validators reached sometime this week. 

These early validators are both larger investors running independent nodes and staking pools with many contributors.  Together they have locked up over $12 Million worth of Ethereum, unable to withdraw it until the final merge of the old chain with 2.0.

Ethereum 2.0's Launch is Right Around The Corner... AGAIN.

We've documented Ethereum founder Vitalik giving speeches on Ethereum 2.0 as far back as 2017.

Then in 2019 we were told it could launch as soon as early 2020.

Everything made sense at this point, knowing that planning began in 2017, even 2020 seems like a long time, but we understood - this blockchain would move trillions of dollars in value in it's future, making sure it's free of errors and secure is extremely important.

So - 2 full years to implement everything, sounds reasonable enough. Remember, the biggest change is moving to a proof of stake algorithm, replacing the proof of work miners with a more efficient system, one that already exists and other blockchains are doing.  They aren't inventing this, they're implementing it.

2020 begins with a short delay but we were told with '95% Confidence' it was still coming in 2020.  After a couple months Vitalik was asked for an update, 'still on track' he said.

Obviously, that didn't happen.

At the time, crypto was exploding in popularity and the high demand made transaction fees skyrocket.

In other words, leaving leaving things as they were became INSANELY profitable...

Let's look back to the day in 2019 when they said Ethereum 2.0 would come in 2020 - all transaction fees for the entire day totaled $119,106. 

Now let's look at June 2020, the month we were told the release would happen is also a month transaction fees hit new all-time highs, in just ONE DAY people spent over $14 million in fees.

While we don't know how involved in mining the Ethereum developers/founders are, it's very likely that if you created a token that relied on miners, you're going to run some mining rigs, at least to help get it off the ground.  Then as your blockchain's popularity grew, wouldn't you increase the mining power you contribute? If you were part of launching it, participating in running it just makes sense.

It isn't speculation to say that upgrading at that point would have put an end to the massive daily jackpot Ethereum miners were enjoying. 

As the date given for Ethereum 2.0's Launch Approaches, Transaction Fee Costs Explode...

Even if you don't find the timing of all this as suspicious as I do, the point is - the upgrade to 2.0 never happened. 

So will it happen this time?

With so many other blockchains taking people away from Ethereum, fees have finally come down again.  Because so many alternatives now exist, and traders have shown they have a limit to how long they're willing to accept ridiculously high fees - it looks like there's more incentive for Ethereum to upgrade than not.

At the rate Ethereum is losing users to alternatives, there's more profit in launching 2.0 in order to bring people back.

While over the past years more projects chose to launch on other blockchains than ever before, many still also chose Ethereum.  However, talk to those project's leaders and virtually all of them share that their choice was made not because they're satisficed with the current state of Ethereum, but because they're counting on Ethereum 2.0 to resolve the high trading fees, which they all acknowledge has cost them users.

In conclusion...

For these reasons - I believe 2022 is the year they finally deliver, Ethereum 2.0 is coming - and this is the first time that statement is true.  
------- 

Author: Justin Derbek
New York News Desk
Breaking Crypto News

Get $40 Bitcoin for $20 NOW: Click here!



Ethereum 2.0 (The Official Merge of Blockchains) Launch in AUGUST!? "Stars are aligned" Says Ethereum Foundation Team Member...

 

Ethereum 2.0

Speaking at the Permissionless 2022 Conference this week in Florida, Ethereum Foundation Sharding researcher Justin Drake said:

“It won't be June, but likely in the few months after. No firm date yet, but we're definitely in the final chapter of PoW on Ethereum.”

He than elaborated, saying...

“As far as we know, if everything goes to plan, August—it just makes sense. If we don't have to move, let's do it as soon as we can.””

Finally, giving his reasoning behind the date...

“Strong desire to make this happen before difficulty bomb in August. Stars are aligned.”

What is a difficulty bomb? 

The big deal about Ethereum 2.0 is the change to Proof Of Stake mining, the essentials you need to know are: this no longer requires the use of power-hungry mining rigs used in the current 'Proof Of Work' mining.  

The current type of mining is considered bad for the environment, because miners have computer processors working at maximum levels to solve mathematical puzzles, included in this process is encrypting and processing transactions, and creating newly minted coins which are given to miners as a their reward.

The difficulty bomb was created by Ethereum developers in 2016 with the merge to 2.0 in mind.  Once it begins, the bomb will exponentially increase the difficulty level of the puzzles required for proof of work mining, eventually making that mining impossible to do. 

The difficulty bomb is intended to stop miners who wish to continue mining the Ethereum 1.0 (Proof of Work) chain once the network has fully moved to Ethereum 2.0 (Proof of Stake).

The old and new method were supposed to overlap for awhile before the difficulty bomb kicks in, but they've lagged so long on Ethereum 2.0's launch that back in 2016 when they scheduled the difficulty bomb, they imagined Ethereum 2.0 would have launched long before now.  

A short history:

Nov 2017 "The Ethereum Killer Is Ethereum 2.0" Nasdaq reported.

June 2019 "Ethereum “ETH 2.0” Genesis Block May Launch in January 2020" Blocknomi reported 

Feb 2020 "95% Confidence': Ethereum Developers Pencil In July 2020 for Eth 2.0 Launch" Coindesk reported

May 2020 "Vitalik Buterin Says Much-Delayed Ethereum 2.0 Still on Track for July Launch" Coindesk reported.

From this point onward, there's a never-ending supply of articles saying the launch is near, sometimes based on nothing and sometime fueled by statements from Ethereum developers that imply this is the case. 

So, does this mean we can definitely expect the merge complete and Ethereum 2.0 up and operational by August? 

Nope.  Developers can propose pushing it back, it's happened before

While it would be yet another failed milestone, something most developers would find embarrassing, in the case of Ethereum's dev team it's just another entry on the massive list of all the other meaningless deadlines they gave the public. 

-------

Author: Mark Pippen
London News Desk 
Breaking Crypto News


Ethereum's Fee's Are So High It's DAMAGING Crypto - How The Once Impressive Platform Became Our Biggest EMBARRASSMENT...


First, let me say I write this as someone who first bought Ethereum when it was still under $100, and in the years since both ETH and countless ERC20 tokens held a majority share of my crypto portfolio.

I wasn't someone who 'had some' - I was a true supporter, someone who believed the things I was witnessing with smart contracts and the ability for anyone to create a coin on the Ethereum blockchain would be what sends crypto into the mainstream.

For awhile that vision is exactly what seemed to be playing out, but the time has come for everyone who cares about this crypto thing to stop downplaying the disaster that is Ethereum.

Seems I have just discovered how long nostalgia and sentimental value will allow me to pretend everything is okay, because suddenly I cannot avoid seeing just how bad things have become. 

Think Of How You Explained Crypto To Your Friends and Family - Ethereum Has Made Liars Of Us All...

When explaining your crypto obsession to friends or family you probably used words like 'fast' and 'low fees' - two things that have not applied to Ethereum in quite some time. Since November 2020 every transaction has been over $1, and for all of 2021 it's been over $10.

Today try to do a trade on Uniswap, and (at the time of publishing) you will see the Ethereum network attempt to charge you a trading fee of $150+ for s simple trade, that's after a  $60+ fee just to authorize a coin you hold to be traded in the first place.

If you were to sell $200 worth of Ethereum on a DEX (decentralized exchange) right now - you would receive $0 for it - the entire transaction swallowed up by fees.  Yes the exchange's fees are a part of the problem - but the price of using it for trading is absolutely relevant.

Today A New Record Was Set - $69 Average Transaction Fee! 

That's simply sending from one wallet to another, a standard person to person payment. If you wanted to send a friend $50, your total cost would be $119.  

The #2 cryptocurrency in the world right now is indeed a total disaster.

Eth gas costs
Transaction costs today according to Ethercan


How foolish do we look when it comes down to the basic primary function - sending money from one place to another - tech from the 1970's would outperform Ethereum on both speed and costs.

It's even worse when we consider this is many people's first impression. Crypto is exploding and the first coin someone owns is typically BTC or ETH, often because Bitcoin's already high price intimidates a lot of people.

When I hear that a friend is one of these people making their first crypto purchase I find myself saying 'congrats!' but thinking 'dear god please never let him seriously try to use this for anything more than trading it on the same exchange he bought it on'.

Spending $50 To Send $100 - Which Takes 15 Minutes To Arrive - That's The OPPOSITE Of What Crypto Is Supposed To Be...

There's no valid reason this needs to be happening.  I'm going to avoid specifically naming any alternative blockchains because the Ethereum devs at fault will point to that and claim this piece was just 'shilling' for whatever coins I mention - I won't give them that opportunity, Ethereum is the only coin we're discussing here.

Just be aware there's no debate - Ethereum's success is purely based on timing, not performance.  There's a fairly long list of alternatives that could easily handle Ethereum's transaction load and keep fees at a price point in 'cents' not dollars.  But Ethereum took it's place next to Bitcoin on every chart at a time when it was able to handle the much smaller amount of transactions - and that's some extremely powerful marketing.

Imagine a coin with these specs attempting to launch today, it would attract 0 investors, 0 users, and no one would want their name associated with it. 

Ask yourself - how would Ethereum market itself if it was brand new, but had the fees it has today.  The images in my mind are hilarious. 

People buy it because it's the #2 cryptocurrency - and that helps to keep it the #2 cryptocurrency...

They tell us a solution coming with Ethereum 2.0, and that's true... once it actually happens. Instead, as fees got higher the process of upgrading to 2.0 shifted from something exciting right around the corner, to a sluggish process where things that were 'just around the corner' are now coming 'someday, eventually'.

They say it's because they want to make sure it's safe and secure, which we all want - but that excuse is complete bullsh*t.  Qualified developers would be finished with the goals laid out in 2017 by now - and I'm not saying they're unqualified. Knowing what Ethereum's developers are capable of is actually how I arrive at these conclusions. At best they're slacking off, at worst, it's deliberate.

Also worth mentioning - scaling is an issue that if a project is managed correctly, has no effect on the users.  If your users are feeling negative effects of your growth, the project is mismanaged.  The growth means the project has the resources (money) to solve the scaling. 

There's HUNDREDS of coins running on proof-of-stake validation algorithms (a method of processing transactions, aka mining) but Ethereum devs are pretending they are inventing this already existing technology. How likely is it that while they drag their feet they're also mining and grabbing as much of these disgustingly inflated fees as they can for themselves?

Look at this video we posted in 2019 of Ethereum founder Vitalik talking about Ethereum 2.0 and tell me if you're left with the impression that he's talking about things that still won't be here by mid 2021. Does he come across like he is speaking about an abstract 'rough draft' concept that will take years to become a reality?

We can go back even further and the reality of what's happening becomes crystal clear when you look at the Ethereum.org page for Eth 2.0 - it now says sharding (which will dramatically increase the amount of transactions processed) has a vague release date of sometime in 2022.

Yet all the way back in 2018 Vitalik was tweeting 'sharding is coming' and this Reddit post, also 3+ years old, once again does NOT leave the reader with the impression that we're looking at concepts that still won't be a reality in the middle of 2021. 

Another 2018 post made by a developer with the role of 'Building Ethereum 2.0' states "As the number of transactions on Ethereum keeps going up and up, we have no time to lose. Let’s get started." so we can rule out the possibility that Ethereum's success caught it's developers off guard and they've been scrambling to catch up. Fees were 0.74 cents when this post emphasizing the urgency of providing a solution was made. 

There's No Way To Measure The Damage This Is Causing...

The crypto world looks like a joke as long as something considered one of the 'top coins' fails on both price and performance. Bitcoin seems to have fully made the transition to being branded a 'store of value' thus competing with gold - on that note Bitcoin is easier to buy, store, and sell.  So an argument can be made that it is the superior choice to gold.

No such argument exists when it comes to Ethereum.  It holds a position it no longer deserves.

I explained why I can't name specifics, but alternatives are starting to grow at a surprising rate. One is regularly now passing Ethereum's daily volume, which even shocked me.

After seeing that, my opinion shifted a bit - I was under the impression so much had been built on Ethereum that their position was locked in and it this all amounted to 'tough luck' and the crypto world would just have to ride it out. But we're starting to see tokens deciding to have both an ERC20 version, and one on another faster, lower fee blockchain.

Currently, having an ERC20 token provides easy instant exposure to a huge number of traders, but projects worry the fees may cause someone to wait on buying a coin longer than they typically would.

But with traders a shift is happening fast - those who were once completely focused on coins they could find on Etherdelta/Forkdelta, then Uniswap, no longer limit themselves to the Ethereum blockchain - after doing so for years.

The numbers don't lie - Ethereum's top competitor had 393K wallets created yesterday, beating Etherum by over 100,000 wallets.  While some would respond by pointing out many people already have an Ethereum wallet, that doesn't explain how they also did 9X as many transactions.

In Closing...

I believe the current situation is the result of a 'we're untouchable' mindset within Ethereum's core developers - the lack of urgency comes from feeling like theirs no consequences for lagging.  I believe if they maintain this mindset for much longer it'll be the mistake that haunts them for the rest of their lives.

It takes a couple high profile projects with ERC20 tokens to officially switch to another blockchain, and receive praise from their users for doing so - and the smaller coins will follow as being on Ethereum officially becomes a 'downside' to more and more people.

A coin switching blockchains could now be seen as freeing their supporters from fees they found slightly annoying at $1-$10, and downright insulting at over $50.

You would be surprised at how much a new project relies on having a high number of people buy small amounts of $500 or less worth of tokens. At Ethereum's current rates I suspect they will lose most purchases of $200 or less, and all purchases from people who would have spent $100 or less.

As someone who one supported Ethereum, I'd love to once again.  I strongly suggest those in a position to do so, change anything in their timeline that says 2022 to 2021 and shift your mindset to that of a software company losing customers until your new version is released, once again making your product competitive. 

-----------
Author: Ross Davis 
E-Mail: Ross@GlobalCryptoPress.com Twitter:@RossFM
San Francisco Newsroom / Breaking Crypto News
Spend $20, GET $40! Do it while you still can here!